Visit BODC Diocesan Directory

You are here: Bombay Orthodox Diocese»Learn Orthodoxy

Learn Orthodoxy

Is there an Orthodox Bible?

Many people do not know that there is an essential difference between the Protestant Churches and the Orthodox Church concerning the Bible. This is not only seen in the attitude towards the Bible and the attitude towards the Bible and the way of interpreting individual texts of it, but also in the number of books contained in the Bible. The contents of the Bible are known as the Canon in its technical sense. As far as the Canon of the New Testament is concerned, all the Churches in the East and West follow the list prepared by St. Athanasius of Alexandra, the stalwart of the Council of Nicea in his Easter letter of AD 327. It put an end to the disputes between Eastern and Western Churches concerning the content of the New Testament and it was established that 27 books from St.Mathew to the Book of Revelation would from the New Testament.

The term Old Testament is coined by the Christians and it indicates the Bible of Jews. During the time of Jesus there were two types of Jews based on their cultural heritage. One group had its base in Palestine and they used the Hebrew Bible.  A  Council of Rabbis held in Jamnia completed the Canon of this Bible only in AD 100. This Bible had only 39 books which is the reason why the Bible used by the Protestants does not include the seven books mentioned above.

However, a great number of Jews lived in different parts of the Roman Empire outside Palestine. Alexandria was their cultural centre and they used Greek as their language for communication. It can be seen that the new generations of Malankara Orthodox Church who use English instead of Malayalam. The Bible of Jews was prepared in Greek language during the reign of King Ptolemy II (285-247 BCE). This was called the Septuagint, which means Seventy in Greek, because of the seventy people who were engaged in its formation.

The Septuagint was not merely a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible; instead it had three changes in comparison with the Hebrew Bible:

  1. It contained seven additional books, namely, 1-2 Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, Baruch, Bara Sirach and Wisdom of Solomon.
  2. There were some additions and changes in the books like Esther and Daniel.
  3. The order of the books in the Septuagint was different from that of the Hebrew Bible. For example, II Chronicles was the last book of the Hebrew Bible. The numbering of Psalms was also different in the Septuagint.

Now the most important question is: what was the Bible used by Jesus and his disciples? None of the books of the New Testament    was written during the time of Jesus; the Bible, which he used, was that of the Jews. Once the new scriptures were written by the Early Christians, the Church reffered to it as the Old Testament rather than the Hebrew Bible of the Palestinian Jews. Since the Canon of the Hebrew Bible  was finalized only in AD 90 there is every reason to conclude that Septuagint was used during that time. Moreover, the modern researches have proved that the New Testament writers like St.Mathew and St. Paul quoted not from the Hebrew Bible but from the Septuagint.Since we want to follow the Old Testament of the Apostles and the Early Church, we consider the seven books mentioned above as scriptural texts.

Now the most important question is: what was the Bible used by Jesus and his disciples? None of the books of the New Testament    was written during the time of Jesus; the Bible, which he used, was that of the Jews. Once the new scriptures were written by the Early Christians, the Church reffered to it as the Old Testament rather than the Hebrew Bible of the Palestinian Jews. Since the Canon of the Hebrew Bible  was finalized only in AD 90 there is every reason to conclude that Septuagint was used during that time. Moreover, the modern researches have proved that the New Testament writers like St.Mathew and St. Paul quoted not from the Hebrew Bible but from the Septuagint.Since we want to follow the Old Testament of the Apostles and the Early Church, we consider the seven books mentioned above as scriptural texts.

The above are two most important reasons why the Deutrocanonical books could be considered as scriptural texts. The Orthodox Church of India considered the Syriac Peshitta version as its Bible. This was originated in the Aramaic speaking world of the Jews in the dawn of the modern of the modern age. The word Peshitta means “simple” and the version was more or less the same as Septuagint in content. That’s why we teach the 46 Old Testament books and include the seven books in our liturgical life.


prepared by Fr.Thomas Philipose


How old is the orthodox faith?

If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex-monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517.

If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to re-marry.
If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560.If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582.


If you are Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England, founded by Samuel Senbury in the American colonies in the 17th century. If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1606.
If you are of the Dutch Reformed Church, you recognize Michelis Jones as founder because he originated your religion in New York in 1628. If you are a Methodist, your religion was founded by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1774.


If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, New York, in 1829.If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865.


If you are Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mary Baker Eddy as its founder.


If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as “Church of the Nazarene, Pentecostal Gospel,” “Holiness Church,” or “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past hundred years.


If you are Roman Catholic, your church shared the same rich apostolic and doctrinal heritage as the Orthodox Church for the first thousand years of its history, since during the first millennium they were one and the same Church. Lamentably, in 1054, the Pope of Rome broke away from the other four Apostolic Patriarchates (which include Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem), by tampering with the Original Creed of the Church, and considering himself to be infallible. Thus your church is 1,000 years old.


If you are a Malankara Orthodox Christian, your Church was founded in India by St Thomas , the Disciple of Lord Jesus Christ in AD.52 as the part of universal Orthodox Church (The one Holy, Catholic(Universal) Apostolic ).The Orthodox Christianity was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ, the Son of God. It has not changed since that time. Our church is now almost 2,000 years old. And it is for this reason, that Orthodoxy, the Church of the Apostles and the Fathers is considered the true “one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.” This is the greatest legacy that we can pass on to the young people of the new millennium.

Knowing Our Sister Churches

With the reformation Movement of 16th Century led by Martin Luther, a lot of the Christians of Western Europe protested against the teachings of Roman Catholic Church and they moved out of Roman Patronage. Their Churches were called by the name the Protestants. Lutheran Church, Reformed Church, Anglican Church, Presbyterian Church and Methodist Church are the major Protestant Churches of the world. From the Protestant Churches, by the end of the 19th Century or at the beginning of the 20th century a lot of Pentacostal Sectarian groups came into existence, and do not have a sound theological India we may find representative of almost all protestant groups and new Sectarian Groups. Some of them stay in alliances like the Church of South India (CSI) and the Church of North India (CNI).Even though the Mar Thoma Church is not a member of these alliances it has communion with them as a Protestant Church. Mar Thoma Church is theologically protestant and traditionally a Eastern Church.


We can conclude that, we can classify the Christian Church all over the world in to three Groups under the title Orthodox, Catholic and Protestants. All the denominations come under any of these mentioned groups. With the advent of colonial age the churches of the Western colonial rulers spread in many countries of the world. Thus we have 970 Catholics and 470 million Protestants in the world today. About 275 millions Christians of the world belong to Pentecostal sectarian groups. The Oriental Orthodox Family Comprises of the Churches of Egypt, Ethiopia, Eretria, Syria, Armenia and India. There are Churches in Russia, Greece, Rumania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Check Republic etc which belong to the Byzantine Orthodox Family. Altogether, the Eastern Orthodox Family make up 220 million of the world .



Know your own Church

The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, also known as the Indian Orthodox Church, is an autocephalous Oriental Orthodox Church. This Church was founded by St. Thomas, the apostle of Jesus Christ. The primate of this Church is ‘His Holiness the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan’ who is also the spiritual, temporal and ecclesiastical head of the Church. The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church has parishes within India and across the world, tracing its origin to the first century evangelical activity of St. Thomas, the apostle.

Historically, the Saint Thomas Christians were united in leadership and liturgy, being part of the Church of the East centered in Persia. During the 16th century, the Portuguese Jesuits attempted to forcefully bring the community into the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church. Resentment to these measures led the majority of the community to join the ArchdeaconThomas’, in swearing to never submit to the Portuguese in the Coonan Cross Oath of 1653. The Church that followed Archdeacon Thomas continued as the Malankara Church. Following the arrival of the Bishop Gregorios Abdul Jaleel of Jerusalem, Archdeacon Thomas forged a relationship with the Syrian Orthodox Church and gradually adopted West Syrian liturgy and practices. The 19th century witnessed the formation of the Marthoma Church from the flock of the Malankara Church under the influence of the Anglican missionaries. By the end of the 19th century, relations between the Syrian Orthodox Patriarchs and the local hierarchy soured, particularly after Patriarch Ignatius Peter IV (1872 – 1894) began demanding registered deeds for the transfer of properties. In 1912, the Patriarch Ignatius Abdul Massiah consecrated H.G. Murimattathil Paulose Mar Ivanios as Catholicos of the East with the name ‘Baselios Paulose I’.

The Church is theologically and traditionally a part of the Oriental Orthodox communion of Churches. The Indian Orthodox Church accepts the Alexandrian Christology, as does the Coptic Orthodox Church, and uses the Malankara Rite – a local variant of the West Syrian Rite.

History: Upto 17th century

St. Thomas, the Apostle, is credited by tradition for founding the Indian Church in A.D. 52. The local Church maintained its autonomous character under its local leader. The Church in Kerala was an administratively independent community until the Portuguese established themselves in India during the 16th century. Following the arrival of Vasco de Gama in 1498, the Portuguese came to South India and established their political power in the region. They encouraged missionaries to carry out evangelistic work in order to establish Churches in communion with Rome under the Portuguese patronage.

The missionaries were eager to bring the Indian Church under the authority of the Pope. They succeeded in their efforts in 1599 at the Synod of Diamper. The representatives from various parishes attending the assembly were forced by the Portuguese authorities into accepting the Papal authority. Following the synod, the Indian Church was governed by Portuguese prelates. They were generally unwilling to respect the integrity of the local Church. This evoked great dissatisfaction within the Malankara Church which gave rise to a revolt in 1653 leading to the historic event of ‘The Coonan Cross Oath’. This event demanded autonomy for the local Church. Since the local Church had no bishop, it had to undergo severe hardships. It appealed to several eastern christian Churches for assistance and help during this crisis. Responding to the appeal, the Antiochene Syrian Patriarch sent Metropolitan Mar Gregorios of Jerusalem to India in 1665. He confirmed Mar Thoma I as the bishop and worked together with him inorder to organize the Church. Until 1599, the Malankara Church depended on the prelates of the Assyrian (Persian) Church to ordain its own priests.

Reign of the Marthoma Metropolitans (1653–1816)

In 1653, following the Coonan Cross Oath the Malankara Church felt the need to have an indigenous bishop. The parish elders (Idavaka Mooppens) of the Church met together and elected Archdeacon Thomas as their leader. This was followed by a general meeting at Aalangad on 22nd May 1653 where Archdeacon Thomas was elevated to the status of bishop with the title Mar Thoma I by laying on of hands of 12 leading priests of the Church.

The other section of Christians under the Roman Catholic Church did not consider Mar Thoma I as a bishop due to the nature of his ordination and many of the revolters returned to the Roman Catholic Church between 1653 and 1665 as a result of the proselytization efforts of the Carmelite missionaries sent by Rome. To confirm this rank, the Metropolitan along with the leaders of the Church wrote letters to the patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch to send a higher authority to assist in the same. At the end of a twelve year long period of no response from any of the Churches, the Syrian Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem – ‘Mar Gregorios Abdul Jaleel’ arrived in India in the year 1665. After having understood the situation of the Malankara Church, he regularised the consecration of Mar Thoma I. This started the reign of the Mar Thoma Metropolitans of the Pakalomattom family in Malankara.

After the reign of Marthoma IX, the Metropolitans of the Church came from different families. Now they were more popularly known with the title Malankara Metropolitan than as Mar Thoma. Malankara Metropolitans started to be recognised by the secular rulers of Travancore and Cochin kingdoms by a Royal Proclamation. Nevertheless, the title Marthoma continues to be used by the Catholicos of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church.

19th century

In 1795, the British captured the region of Malabar in Kerala. In 1806, Rev. Claudius Buchanan – an Anglican priest visited the ancient Church of St. Thomas in India. The Malankara Church opened a seminary at Kottayam in March 1815 and no sooner the Anglican missionaries joined the institution the very next year. However, the missionaries began to impose Protestant doctrines on the seminarians which resulted in the Malankara Church discontinuing its association with the missionaries.

This gave rise to the division of the community into three bodies:

  • One of them set out to bring about major reforms in the liturgy and practices of the Church, but failed. After about half a century of conflict within the Church, this body moved out of the Malankara Church and organized itself as the Marthoma Church.
  • A smaller body of the Malankara Church opted to join with the missionaries and got itself absorbed into the Anglican Church.
  • A large majority of the community continued as the Malankara Orthodox Church without accepting the reforms.

20th century

In 1912, the Catholicate of the East was revived in India. The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church wanted to retain its autocephalous nature and thus appealed the same to Patriarch Ignatius Abdul Massiah II of the Syrian Orthodox Church. The Patriarch consented and consecrated Murimattathil Paulose Mar Ivanios as Baselios Paulose I, Catholicos of the East. In 1912, the consecration ceremony was held at St. Mary’s Church at Niranam – the church established by St. Thomas, the apostle.


Hierarchy and doctrine

The spiritual head of the Church is the Catholicos of the East and the temporal head over Church assets is the Malankara Metropolitan. Since 1934, both the titles vest in one person. The official title of the head of the Church is “the Catholicos of the East and the Malankara Metropolitan“. The present Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan is His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Marthoma Paulose II, who was enthroned on 1st November 2010, at Parumala Church by the Holy Episcopal Synod. H. H. Paulose II is the 91st Catholicos of the East in the lineage of the Apostle St. Thomas, the 8th Catholicos after its re-instatement in India and the 21st Malankara Metropolitan.

The Church accepts only the first three Ecumenical Synods like all other Oriental Orthodox Churches. The Church in India was connected to the Church of East through the Catholicos of the East which existed in Edessa, Selucia, Tigris and Mosul during various time periods. Primarily, the Church uses the liturgy of Saint James, as does its sister Church – the Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch. As of today the Church celebrates liturgy in West Syriac, Malayalam, English, Hindi, Tamil, Konkani and Kannada.

The Church has two theological seminaries located at Kottayam and Nagpur. It has dioceses and churches in most parts of India as well as in nations like the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Western Europe, Africa, Persian Gulf nations, Malaysia, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand.

In short, the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church refers to St. Thomas Christians of India who are in obedience to the Catholicate of the East whose supreme head is His Holiness the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan with its headquarters at Devalokam in the district of Kottayam situated in the state of Kerala in India.

The Constitution of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church


The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church has her own official constitution which was formulated in the year 1934. Every member of the Church including H. H. the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan, all diocesan metropolitans, the clergy and the laity are bound by the rules and regulations mentioned in the constitution. All the parishes of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church whether in India or in other regions of the world are governed by the constitution.

As the Church had no written constitution until 1934, it was governed by consensus, traditions and precedence. The constitution was presented in the Malankara Christian Association Meeting of 26th December 1934 held at M. D. Seminary at Kottayam following which it was adopted and brought to force. The constitution was amended on three occasions to meet specific situations and needs. Though the validity of the constitution was challenged in the Court, the Supreme Court in its final verdict declared, confirmed and upheld the validity of the constitution. The constitution upholds the autonomous and autocephalous nature of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. The constitution enshrines the fundamental features of the Church, provides direction for its internal administration and preserves its integrity and autonomy. The essential features of the Church are provided in the preamble. The first article emphasizes the relationship between the Church of Syria and Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. The second article highlights the foundation of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church by St. Thomas and the primacy of His Holiness the Catholicos of the East. The third article refers to the name of the Church and the fourth about the faith, traditions and so on. The fifth article deals with the canons governing the administration of the Church. The constitution as a whole conceives the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church as self-sufficient in all her requirements, be it temporal, ecclesiastical or spiritual in nature and upholds that the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church is rightly autocephalous in character.


Since the 17th century, the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church uses the Syrian Orthodox Liturgy, which belongs to the Antiochene liturgical tradition. The East Syrian (Persian), Byzantine, Armenian, Georgian, Maronite liturgies also belong to the same liturgical family. In the first half of the 5th century, the Antiochene Church adopted the anaphora of Jerusalem, i.e., the anaphora of St. James, the disciple. During the 4th and 5th centuries, the liturgical language of Jerusalem and Antioch was Greek. Therefore, the original form of the liturgy of St. James was composed in Greek.

Following the Council of Chalcedon (A. D. 451), the Eastern Church was divided into two, one faction accepting the council, while the other opposing it. Both groups continued to use the Greek version of the anaphora of St. James. The Byzantine emperor Justin (518–527) expelled the non-Chalcedonians from Antioch who took refuge in the Syriac speaking Mesopotamia on the Roman-Persian Border (modern Eastern Syria, Iraq and South East Turkey). Gradually, the Antiochene liturgical rites were translated into Syriac. New elements such as Syriac hymns were introduced into it.

Mar Gregorios of Jerusalem came to Malankara in 1665 and introduced Syrian Orthodox liturgical rites. The most striking characteristic of the Antiochene liturgy is the large number of anaphoras (Order of the celebration of the Eucharist) included in it, of which about eighty are known and about a dozen are used in India. All of them have been composed keeping the Liturgy of St. James as a model.

Catholicate of the East

The word “Catholicos” means “The General Head”. It can be considered as equivalent to “Universal Bishop”. There were only three ranks of priesthood in the early Church, viz., Episcopos (Bishop), Priest and Deacon. By the end of the 3rd century, bishops of certain important cities in the Roman empire gained eminence over other bishops and came to be known as Metropolitans. The Ecumenical councils of the 4th century recognized the supreme authority of these Metropolitans. By the 5th century, the bishops in major cities like Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria and Antioch gained control over the churches in the surrounding cities. Gradually they became the heads of each independent regional Church and were called Patriarch which means common father. The same rank in the Churches outside the Roman Empire was called Catholicos. There have been three ancient Catholicates in the Church before the onset of the fifth century, viz., the Catholicate of the East, the Catholicate of Armenia and the Catholicate of Georgia. None of these ranks and titles has been the monopoly of any particular Church. Any apostolic and national Church has the authority to declare and call its head – Catholicos or Pope or Patriarch.

St. Thomas established the Church in India and is recognized as its first Head or Catholicos.

The reign of the Archdeacons lasted from the 4th century till the 16th century. A renewed chapter began in the history of the Church when the archdeacon was elevated by the community to the position of a Bishop with the name Mar Thoma I in 1653. Since then, the head of the community was the Marthoma Methran whose position evolved into that of the ‘Malankara Metropolitan’ with greater recognition.

In 1912, the Catholicate of the East got relocated to India and His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Paulose I was enthroned on the Apostolic Throne of St. Thomas as the Catholicos of the East.


Sanctuary of Catholicos

The headquarters of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church got permanently based at Devalokam on 31st December 1951 at Kottayam in Kerala. It is the official headquarters of the Catholicos of the East who reigns on the Supreme Throne of St. Thomas, the Apostle.

The new aramana built in 1961 was inaugurated by the visiting Armenian Catholicos Vazgen I. A portion of the holy relics of St. Thomas, the Apostle, has been kept in the Catholicate Chapel. The mortal remains of His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Geevarghese II, His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Augen I, His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Marthoma Mathews I and Metropolitan Dr. Thomas Mar Makarios are entombed in this Chapel.

The lineage of the Catholicos starts with the Apostle St. Thomas, continuing with the bishops of Edessa and Archbishops in Selucia-Ctesiphon. In A.D. 410, Isaac first used the title Catholicos. Since then, the Catholicos has claimed jurisdiction over all Christians of the East outside the Roman Empire. This Catholicate resided in Persia until the end of the 19th century. In 1912, the senior Patriarch of the Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch relocated the Catholicate of the East to India. His Holiness Moran Mar Baselios Marthoma Paulose II is the 91st Catholicos enthroned on the throne of Saint Thomas.

Further Divisions in the West


During the centuries after A.D 1054, the growing distinction between East and West was becoming indelibly marked in the history. The Eastern Church (Both Oriental and Byzantine Orthodox Churches) maintained the full stream of New Testament faith, worship, and practice-all the while enduring great  persecution from both Islamic forces and also from her western counterpart.( See the crusades, I will narrate about crusades latter).The Roman Catholic Church(Western Church) bogged down in many problems. Then, less than five centuries after Rome committed itself to its unilateral alteration of doctrine and practice, another upheaval occurred-this time inside the western gates.


Although many in the west had spoken out against Roman domination and practice in earlier years, now a little-known German monk Martin Luther inadvertently launched an attack against Roman Catholic practices which ended up affecting world history. His list of Ninety Five Thesis was nailed to the Church door at Wittenberg in 1517, signaling the start of what came to be called the protestant Reformation. Luther had intended no break in Rome, but he could not be reconciled to its papal system of government as well as other doctrinal issues. He was excommunicated in 1521, and the door to future unity in the West slammed shut with a resounding crash.


The reforms Luther sought in Germany were soon accompanied by demand of Ulrich Zwingli in Zurich, John Calvin in Geneva, and hundreds of others all over Western Europe. Fueled by complex political, social, and economic factors in addition to the religious problems, the Reformation spread like a ranging fire into virtually every nook and cranny of Roman Catholic Church. The ecclesiastical monopoly to which it had grown accustomed was greatly diminished, and massive division replaced unity. The ripple effect of that division impacts even today as the Protestant movement continues to split.


If trouble on the European continent were not trouble enough, the Church of England was in a process of going its own way as well. Henry VIII, amidst his marital problems, replaced the Pope of Rome with himself as head of the Church of England. As a decade followed decade in the West, the branches of Protestantism continued to divide. There were even branches that insisted they were neither Protestant nor Roman Catholic. All seemed to share a mutual dislike for the Bishop of Rome and the practices of his Church, and most wanted far less centralized forms of leadership. While some, such as the Lutherans and Anglicans, held on to certain forms of liturgy and sacrament, others, such as the Reformed Churches and the even more radical Anabaptists and their descendants, questioned and rejected many ideas of hierarchy, sacrament, historic tradition, thinking they were freeing themselves of only Roman Catholicism. To this day, many sincere, modern, professing Christians will reject even the biblical data that speaks of historic practices are “Roman Catholic”. To use the old adage, they threw the baby out with the bathwater without even being aware of it.


Thus, while retaining in varying degrees portions of foundational Christianity, neither Protestantism nor Catholicism can lay historic claim to being the true New Testament Church. In dividing from the Orthodox Christianity (Eastern Christianity), Rome forfeited its place in the Church of the New Testament. In the divisions of the Reformation, the Protestants-as well-meaning as they might have been –failed to return to the New Testament Church.


The Great Schism: Disagreement between East and West

During the Middle ages there were frictions within the Chalcedonian group and ultimately it led to a division of the Chalcedonians in1054; the Church of Rome (Roman Catholic Church) stood against the Eastern Christianity (Churches of the Eastern provinces of the Roman Empire).Numerous doctrinal, political, economic, and cultural factors were working to separate the Church into East-west division, two major issues ultimately emerged.


  1. That one man, the Pope of Rome, considered himself the universal bishop of the Church, and
  2. The addition of a novel clause to the Nicene Creed.


  1. Papacy: Among the twelve, St.Peter was early acknowledged as the leader. He was the spokesperson for the twelve before and after Pentecost. He was the first bishop of Antioch and later bishop of Rome. No one challenged his role.


After the death of the apostles, as leadership in the Church developed, the bishop of Rome came to be recognized as first in honor, even though all bishops were equals. But after nearly three hundred years, the bishop of Rome slowly began to assume a role of superiority over the others, ultimately claiming to be the only true successor to Peter. The vast majority of the other bishops of the Church never questioned Rome’s primacy of honour, but they patently rejected the Roman bishop’s claim as the universal head of the Church on earth. This assumption of papal power became one major factor in rending the Roman Church, and all those it could gather with it, from the historic Orthodox Church.


  1. Addition to the Nicene Creed: A disagreement concerning the Holy Spirit also began to develop in the Church. Does the Holy Spirit proceed from the Father or does He proceed from the Father and the Son?
    Our Lord Jesus Christ teaches, “But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me” (St.John 15:26).This is the basic statement in the New Testament about the Holy Spirit “proceeding”, and it is clear : He “proceeds from the Father”. Thus, when the ancient council at Constantinople (A.D 381) reaffirmed the Creed of Nicea (A.D 325), it expanded that Creed to proclaim these familiar words: “And in the one living Holy Spirit, the life giving Lord of all, who proceeds from the Father, and who with the Father and Son is worshiped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets and the apostles”.


Centuries later, in the 9th Century, in a politically motivated move, the Pope of Rome unilaterally changed the universal creed of the Church (The Nicene Creed), without an ecumenical Council, regarding Holy Spirit into “Holy spirit proceeds from the Father and Son”. Though this change was initially rejected in both East and West even by some of Rome’s closest neighboring bishops, the Pope managed to eventually get the West to capitulate. The consequence, of course, in the Western Church has been the tendency to relegate the Holy Spirit to a lesser place than God the Father and God the Son. The change may appear small, but the consequences have proven disastrously immense. This is issue, with the Pope departing from the Orthodox doctrine of the Church, became another instrumental cause separating the Roman Church from the historic Orthodox Church, the New Testament Church.


Conflict between the Roman Pope and the East mounted-especially in the Pope’s dealings with the Patriarch of Constantinople. The Pope even went so far as to claim the authority to decide who should be the bishop of Constantinople in marked violation of historical precedent, No longer operating within the government of the New Testament Church, the Pope appeared to be seeking by political means to bring the whole Church under his dominion.


Bizarre intrigues followed, one upon the other, as a series of Roman popes pursued this unswerving goal of attempting to control all Christendom. Perhaps the most incredible incident of these political, religious, and even military schemes occurred in the year 1054.A cardinal, sent by the Pope, slapped a document on the altar of the Church of Holy Wisdom in Constantinople during the Sunday worship, excommunicating the Patriarch of Constantinople from the Church.


The Pope, of course, had no legitimate right to do this, but the repercussions were staggering. Some dismal chapters of Church history were written during the next decades. The ultimate consequence of the Pope’s action was that the whole Roman Catholic Church ended up divided from the New Testament faith of Orthodox Christianity. The schism has never been healed. As the centuries passed, conflict continued. Attempts at reunion failed, and the Roman Church farther from its historical roots.


Council of Chalcedon (AD 451)

The ancient Church used the title “Orthodox” against the Gnostics, Montanists, Arains and Nestorians to qualify it as the Church having the undefiled faith and their opponents are the heretics. This Church had five main centers at Antioch, Alexandria, Constantinople, Jerusalem and Rome. Today the heads of these Churches are called either Patriarch (Antioch, Constantinople, and Jerusalem) or Pope (Alexandria and Rome).


The ancient Church was divided into two kinds of Christians as a result of the Council of Chalcedon ( AD451).The councils main agenda was to discuss about the Person of Jesus Christ, i.e to say how the divinity and humanity were united in Jesus Christ. The council adopted a doctrinal thesis, which was accepted one group and rejected by the other group. Those who rejected the Council’s decision were called the Non-Caledonians and even today the Churches of Egypt, Syria, Ethiopia, Erithrea, Armenia and India are known by this name; they are also called the oriental Orthodox Christians. On the other side the Christians of the major portion of the Roman Empire accepted the Council of Chalcedon and they were referred to as the Caledonians.


Pages:« Prev12345